Neeraj Gupta - QualityKiosk

In today’s ever-evolving digital landscape, organizations face the challenge of meeting heightened customer expectations while adapting to the intricacies of modern digital ecosystems. As monolithic applications give way to agile microservices architectures, the need for faster time-to-market introduces a paradoxical demand for comprehensive synthetic testing. Microservices, the building blocks of this evolution, operate like interconnected gears, but their intricate interactions can lead to unforeseen disruptions.  

The Monolith-Microservice Conundrum: Navigating Complexity 

In the fast-evolving landscape of software development, the emergence of low-code and no-code platforms has sparked a new wave of innovation. These platforms offer the promise of accelerated development cycles, and they’re not limited to just building applications. Testing, a crucial aspect of software quality assurance, has also been influenced by the low-code/no-code revolution. In this blog, we will take a deep dive into the world of low-code/no-code testing, highlighting its advantages and potential challenges.  

The Rise of Low-Code/No-Code:

The aim of low-code and no-code platforms is to simplify application development, enabling individuals with diverse skill sets to contribute to software development. With these platforms, Testing has also become more accessible to non-technical stakeholders and contributors.  

Pros of Low-Code:/No-Code Testing:

  1. Speed and Efficiency: Low-code/no-code testing tools provide pre-built keywords/, commands/, and functions, significantly reducing the time required for development and execution of test scripts.
  2. Accessibility: Non-technical team members can participate in testing, allowing for broader coverage and contributions during quality assurance processes. 
  3. Rapid Iteration: The visual nature of low-code/no-code testing enables rapid iteration, allowing teams to promptly integrate feedback and adapt to changes. 
  4. User-Centric Approach: The visual interface encourages testing that closely replicates real user experiences, enhancing the authenticity of testing outcomes. 

How are companies reaping the benefits of low-code/no-code testing in reality? Well, a Forrester survey found out through a survey that implemented low-code technology. As per this survey, 83% of its enterprise respondents value low code for its flexibility, 63% use it for speed, and 67% leverage it for its automation.  

Cons of Low-Code/No-Code Testing:

  1. Limited Customization: The flexibility of traditional coding may be sacrificed for ease of use, making it challenging to address unique or complex testing requirements.  
  2. Scalability Concerns: While these platforms excel at smaller projects, they might struggle to accommodate extensive, enterprise-level applications with complex workflows. 
  3. Quality Trade-offs: Simplified test case development could lead to overlooking critical testing scenarios, potentially compromising overall software quality. 
  4. Dependency on Platform Providers: Organizations may become dependent on specific low-code/no-code vendors, which can lead to vendor lock-in and potential limitations on future upgrades, integrations, and innovations. 
  5. Lack of Technical Depth: Testing professionals accustomed to traditional coding may feel constrained by the limited technical depth offered by low-code/no-code solutions. 

Striking the Right Balance:

Low-code/no-code testing tool adoption should be based on project requirements, team skills, and long-term objectives. These platforms can be a game-changer for smaller applications that need speedy deployment. Traditional testing methods may still be superior for complex systems that require extensive modification and scalability, though.  

The testing landscape is changing and becoming more accessible thanks to low-code and no-code testing. Despite the fact that its benefits can be convincing in some situations, it is important to carefully weigh the trade-offs, particularly with regard to customization and scalability.  

Finally, the development of low-code and no-code testing technologies adds a fascinating new facet to software quality assurance. Teams can decide whether to include these technologies in their testing procedures by being aware of their advantages and limits.  

Do you want to know more about QualityKiosk’s low-code testing capabilities? Please contact us at 

About the Author​

With over 23 years of industry experience, Neeraj Gupta has extensive experience in the ever-evolving world of software development, testing, and innovation. His career had a range of roles, from software development to manual and automation testing, and even delving into the exciting realm of IoT. 

Throughout his professional life, Neeraj has worked with distinguished companies such as Datamatics, BNP Paribas, and JP Morgan. At QualityKiosk, Neeraj plays a pivotal role in spearheading automation efforts for synthetic monitoring. His primary focus is to implement transformative automation strategies to ensure the quality and reliability of systems.